melissa yancy

Winner of the 2016 Drue Heinz Literature Prize

Author: Melissa Yancy (page 1 of 3)

New Story Live on Kenyon Review Online

The last story I wrote for my upcoming collection is now up at the Kenyon Review online.  Full (embarrassing) audio also included here.

Coming from Sunny California

CAPD2016-promoThe 2016 California Prose Directory is out!  The California Prose Directory is an anthology that presents short fiction and non-fiction about life in the Golden State.  This year is the third edition, featuring 24 authors compiled by Sarah LaBrie.

I’m honored that my story “Consider this Case” will re-appear in this outstanding line-up:

Kyle Boelte
John Brantingham
Carina Chocano
Meghan Daum
Nathan Deuel
Ann Friedman
Vanessa Hua
Jay Caspian Kang
Adam Klein
Summer Block Kumar
Jillian Lauren
Lisa Locascio
Kevin Magruder
Lou Mathews
Rae Paris
Michah Perks
Zachary Pincus-Roth
Lilibet Snellings
Matthew Specktor
A. A. Srinivasan
Matt Summell
Ronaldo Wilson
Melissa Yancy
Yvonne Zima

You can order it here:   Powell’s

 

It’s Official

Dog Years was selected by Richard Russo as the winner of the 2016 Drue Heinz Literature Prize. The comparison to Lauren Groff’s Delicate Edible Birds is too flattering, but I’ll take it!

http://www.post-gazette.com/ae/books/2016/01/14/Los-Angeles-author-awarded-Drue-Heinz-Prize-for-literature/stories/201601140179

Clark Kent

I’ve been called a lot of things, but never Clark Kent before. This was a phone interview, so I didn’t have the opportunity to edit my answers . . . but I can’t complain about the comparison.

Yancy Balances Work and Play

In between working as a non-profit hero in a children’s hospital and writing fiction, modern day Clark Kent, Melissa Yancy, became this year’s recipient of the Drue Heinz Literature Prize.

As a result, the University of Pittsburgh Press will publish Los Angeles resident Yancy’s manuscript “Dog Years” this year and award her a $15,000 cash prize.

Each year, the University of Pittsburgh Press selects collections of short fiction to publish under a standard contract and cash prize. Acclaimed author Richard Russo chose Yancy’s “Dog Years” out of nearly 300 entries.

“The smart, intricate, carefully crafted stories in Dog Years reminded me of Lauren Groff’s Delicate, Edible Birds for both their ambition and extraordinary beauty,” Russo said in a release.

The 37-year-old Phoenix native graduated from Linfield College in Oregon and went on to earn her MFA from the Master of Professional Writing Program at the University of Southern Carolina.

Through her time spent in pediatrics, Yancy has raised money for education, medical research and clinical programs by working with corporations and non-profit foundations. Her official title is Senior Director of Corporate, Foundation and Research Relations.

Yancy spoke with The Pitt News about how she balances two separate careers, why she chose to submit her collection and advice she has for young writers.

The Pitt News: Congratulations on winning the Drue Heinz Literature Prize! What made you enter your manuscript, “Dog Years?”

Melissa Yancy: I’ve entered before, as well as a number of other collection contests over the years, but each time the collections have changed based on new work. I think this particular group of stories was the first time I entered with that exact collection.

TPN: What are your favorite stories from your collection and why?

MY: I think my favorite is the title story, Dog Years. I like that story because it’s about this really over-the-top sort of modern subject. It’s about two geneticists who have a son who has Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy, a genetic disorder, and they’re basically researching this genetic disease. It could be the premise of a bad B movie.

The story is about their day-to-day lives and the passage of time and I think the kinds of things that frustrate everybody, whether you’re a parent or not, the sort of speed at which time passes and your inability to control it. I think for their lives, because they’re in an extreme situation where their son is degenerating each year, it’s an experience in the maximum form. But on the day-to-day level, it’s really about the typical frustrations that everybody has with time.

TPN: What genre would you consider “Dog Years” to be?

MY: It’s pretty standard literary realism. There’s really no fantastic elements. It’s in a pretty traditional vein of short fiction.

TPN: Have you read Lauren Groff’s “Delicate, Edible Birds,” and if so, what do you think about Russo’s comparison?

MY: It’s a huge compliment. She’s a really amazing writer. I think her work is more textured and rich, and she works more comfortably in a wide variety of settings. I aspire to have that much ambition of scope. I don’t think my work has that yet, but I hope it does at some point.

TPN: What was the inspiration for the stories in the collection?

MY: I didn’t have to look very far. I worked at a fundraiser for health sciences, and I’ve worked in the medical field for about the last eight years. A lot of that has been in pediatric settings. This story was inspired by a few researchers I know and their son.

TPN: What does your writing, and perhaps rewriting, process look like?

MY: I guess it’s just like anybody’s. With short fiction, it’s really different than it is for a novel. A novel requires so much immersion, and I think it’s really hard to work on a long piece unless you’re writing every day. I tend to write a very messy first draft and then see what I’ve got. With short fiction, I guess I’ve been writing it long enough that it’s a little more controlled, depending on the type of stories.

I often only have these little 20 minute bursts of time that I might work on something. In terms of revision, it really depends on the story. There are stories in the collection that I basically had one really strong first draft and then totally minor little revisions. There were other stories that were structurally a little more ambitious or more complicated that I might’ve revised for five years.

When you’ve got two characters in a room and it’s very dialogue driven, there’s not a lot structurally that can really mess you up. But if there’s a story that is moving a lot through time, or has different points of view, there can be a lot more tinkering. One of the stories in particular I think I have probably worked on for a few years and I could still tinker with it more — it never stops.

TPN: How do you balance working full-time and writing?

MY: I have no idea. I have a really long commute. I worked full-time in the non-profit sector for many years: About 14 years. Fortunately, I’ve had a pretty short commute up until the last few years. Now I live in Los Angeles, notorious for traffic, and I have to drive across town for my job now, and that eats up my morning time when I’d like to write. But I think it’s one of those things that the busier you are, you don’t have any time to overthink it. It was much harder for me when I was a student: I had a lot of uninterrupted time.

TPN: Were you a medical student?

MY: My bachelor’s was one of those liberal arts, a little bit of everything, type degrees. My major was religious studies, and my minor was creative writing. But I took every kind of art class, like philosophy, all that stuff, and then I got my master’s in professional writing.

TPN: How did you get into the medical field?

MY: It’s interesting because I got a lot of advice when I was in graduate school from our instructors that I really shouldn’t go into academia. That was the kind of program I was in. They thought you should go join the military or do something interesting with your life, get interesting life experiences. A lot of them had not been academics themselves.

When I graduated, I knew I wanted to do something where I’d be exposed to interesting people. And I thought the nonprofit sector would be a good place to start, where I would encounter people from all walks of life in the city. And so I worked in a variety of nonprofits, but the last eight years I’ve been working in a children’s hospital. I never thought I’d be interested in medicine, but now it’s my day-to-day and it becomes great subject matter for my writing that I never expected to find.

TPN: What advice do you have to aspiring young writers attempting to make a career out of writing?

MY: Well, I think probably the first thing that most writers will tell you is that you’ll probably need another career in addition to your writing career. I know nobody wants to hear that— I know I didn’t want to hear that when I was a student.

I think the other thing that a lot of professors told me is that it’s about the process, not about the product. That’s also really hard to live that philosophy when you’re young, you want the product and the success. I think everyone I know that used to write fiction either in undergraduate or graduate school doesn’t write fiction anymore.

I have friends that are much more talented than I am, who just couldn’t keep doing it for whatever reason — other matters of life either got in the way or they just found the whole failure really frustrating, so it’s really not talent, it’s persistence. And everyone is going to tell it’s going to take a long time and there are exceptions, but they’re right. It took even longer than they told me it was going to take.

You have to at some point let it work itself. If you do it for long enough, you start to, even if you’re the kind of person who feels torture from it now, it won’t feel like torture anymore. I think the great thing about writing that I’ve realized now, is that regardless how it’s going in terms of your external success, just the fact that you’re applying that lens to the rest of your day to day life, whether that’s a boring office job or having children or a relationship, it just adds this richness to the rest of your experience.

Washington is calling

I don’t know if this happens to other writers, but every time I see a strange, out-of-state number on my phone, I freak out for a second, trying to guess if it’s a telemarketer (99 times out of 100) or unexpected good news. Sometimes I pick up, sometimes I wait and Google the number. I figure if it’s good news, they’ll leave a message. But when I got the call from the National Endowment for the Arts, I happened to pick up. All I had to hear was where they were calling from for me to know what the news was . . . I was in my office at work, so I couldn’t go too crazy. I once picked up the phone for good news right by the copier and had to bite the inside of my cheeks to keep from screaming.  But the news didn’t really hit me until I saw the list and my name alongside Paul Harding, Anthony Marra, Tea Obreht, Celeste Ng, Peter Ho Davies, Meghan Daum and all the others. It’s kind of crazy that emerging writers have to compete against the big guns for this one, but they do pride themselves on being the most egalitarian of awards.  The timing was perfect/terrible/awesome/ridiculous because I’m six months pregnant, with baby on the brain (and almost no time to write in the foreseeable future!). But I know the NEA award will not only create opportunities, it will provide the kind of legitimacy I need for myself (especially now) and will force me to find a way to prioritize writing projects in the coming year.

NEA Announcement

Pushcart Prize XL

51hKb5iPsDL__SX404_BO1,204,203,200_I love that this year’s Pushcart Prize edition is XL, which makes me think of Magic Mike XXL, the masterpiece of 2015 (seriously).  I heard from Oscar Villalon at Zyzzyva that my story “Dog Years” received a Special Mention, and when I went to look it up in the back of the book, I saw that “Consider this Case” from The Missouri Review had also received a Special Mention. After 12 years of publishing short fiction, seeing two stories listed there in one year was a nice moment. It was fun to see my name right below Ursula K. Le Guin, and alongside so many short story writers I admire.

Lit Crawl

It takes a trip to San Francisco for three L.A.-based writers to meet . . . because L.A. is just like that. On October 17th I had a great time reading with Joe Donnelly, Erika Recordon, and Glen David Gold as part of the Zyzzyva All-Stars Line Up for LitCrawl.  Laura Cogan and Oscar Villalon are really doing outstanding work at Zyzzyva. It’s great to have a strong West Coast literary magazine publishing a wide variety of work, all handsomely put together with good cover art (no easy feat, that). I rarely have a chance to read and I was so grateful for the opportunity (even though I hardly qualify as an all-star anything).  Lit Crawl

Hounds

I have a new story in the Fall/Winter issue of the Colorado Review. It was a finalist for the Nelligan Prize for Short Fiction, and I was delighted that they wanted to publish it (when mags say they will consider all entries for publication, sometimes I wonder if they do . . . ).  It was heavily inspired by some of the work I’ve been doing in my professional life. “Hounds” is a dark story about disfigured veterans, a dying medical research dog, and sex as a weapon. Just a little light holiday reading.

Colorado Review Fall/Winter 2015

Colorado Review: "Hounds"

Colorado Review: “Hounds”

Lit Camp!

mayacamas0242One of the highlights of 2015 was Lit Camp, a four-day workshop put on by Janis Cooke Newman at Mayacamas Ranch near Calistoga. Lit Camp is billed as summer camp for adults, and  lives up to the description!  It’s a gorgeous setting with top-notch faculty and speakers like Paul Harding, Anthony Marra, and Adam Johnson, and unlike most workshops, agents and working editors also participate as workshop leaders. My only complaint is that workshops are limited to 4,000 word submissions, a little short to really get into the work. I was impressed by the quality of the participants–in particular, there were so many interesting non-fiction writers who had crazy experiences as journalists or travelers–not just the usual memoir fare. Nonfiction writers always liven things up a bit. There’s definitely less socializing and less unashamed performance with a crowd of fiction writers. There was a mind-blowing lecture by Adam Johnson on trauma narratives that left the group simultaneously high and exhausted, ready for him to repeat the entire thing again to hear what we had missed. I don’t know if I’ve ever seen writers that rapt during a lecture, especially after a long day of workshopping. I had recently finished reading The Orphan Master’s Son, which to my mind, is an instant classic, the kind we really haven’t seen since the 1950s. They offer three delicious, healthy meals a day, wine galore, smores, campfires and hot tub excursions . . . it doesn’t really get any better than that.  Makes me wish I lived in the Bay Area so I can see the campers more often!  To apply:  Lit Camp

Writing Between the Vines

ext_t-1000x400My first night at Arcosanti, I received the happy news that I’d been accepted into a writing residency at The Madrones in Anderson Valley, as part of the Writing Between the Vines residency program. It calmed my anxiety at Arcosanti, knowing that I’d have another chance to be immersed in the book just eight weeks hence. Writing Between the Vines is a fairly new residency program that provides stays for writers at wineries during the off season, and was featured in the March/April 2015 issue of Poets & Writers.

After Spartan accommodations at Arcosanti, The Madrones was considerably more luxe. The Madrones is a wine country compound with four tasting rooms, an exceptional little restaurant and nine guest rooms. The owner Jim Roberts is a designer, which was reflected in the gorgeous spaces. My room was a suite with a mini-kitchen and a private deck overlooking a koi pond and vineyards, and the property manager Cyndee took exceptional care of me.

Anderson Valley is located north of Napa Valley, so the climate is more wet, coastal and foggy, which makes it Pinot Noir country. It’s quiet and tucked away, without all the traffic and commercial enterprise of Napa, and the quality of the wine is outstanding. Toulouse Vineyards was a standout.

This is writer heaven.

Older posts

© 2017 melissa yancy

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑